The most likely reason mexican citizens had conflicting views of porfirio Diaz’s rule is because He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is Diaz’s rule?</h3>
Generally, During the president of Porfirio Daz (1876–80; 1884–1911), Mexico witnessed considerable development but political rights were constrained and the free press was muzzled. This era is known as the Porfiriato.
In conclusion, The fact that Porfirio Diaz restricted citizens' freedoms while boosting foreign investment and improving infrastructure is the most likely source of the mixed opinions that Mexicans held of his leadership.
Read more about Diaz’s rule
brainly.com/question/774392
#SPJ1
The three-fifths compromise is that A slave would count as three-fifths of a person when paying taxes. Option B is the answer.
<h3>What is Compromise agreement?</h3>
Compromise agreement was done between delegates from different state in 1787.
This is done between the Northern and the Southern states of the United States. The agreement is that three-fifths of the slave that were present in the country will be included in computing tax.
Therefore, The three-fifths compromise is that A slave would count as three-fifths of a person when paying taxes.
Learn more on compromise below
brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Suburb? Can you specify please?
The North Vietnamese forces, especially the Viet Cong made their own explosives. They used explosives that did not explode, cut them open and made their own improvised explosives. They used traps like bamboo maces or crossbows which were activated by trip wires. One common trap was the punji stake trap. This was a bed of very sharp bamboo stakes hidden in a large hole for their enemies to fall into.
