Answer:
Efficient market school.
Explanation:
Efficient market school is the market school which argues that forward exchange rates do the best possible job for forecasting future spot exchange rates, so investing in exchange rate forecasting services would be a waste of time because it is impossible to have a consistent alpha generation on a risk adjusted excess returns basis as market prices are only affected by new informations.
The efficient market school also known as the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is a hypothesis that states that asset (share) prices reflect all information and it is very much impossible to consistently beat the market.
Also, forward exchange rates are exchange rates controlling foreign exchange transactions at a specific future date or time.
<em>Hence, according to the efficient market school it would be a waste of time investing in exchange rate forecasting services because all the information about an asset or security is already factored into their prices and as a result of the randomness of the market. </em>
Answer:
=E7*C2/2
Explanation:
The interest expense will be the carrying value of the bond times the effective interest rate.
On cell C8 we have the interest expense
On E7 we have the carrying value which is the outstanding balance.
Then, on C2 we got the effective rate
As this is an annual formula, we must divide by two to convert to semiannual rate.
A file is attached for how the excel sheet looks like
Answer:
Many people's wealth is held in stocks and as the price of stocks collapsed, they lost wealth.
Imagine that this happened to you. One day you are rich and that affects your spending habits. In a matter of few days or weeks, you lose a large portion of your wealth. So now, you are less rich or even poor. So your spending habits will be altered, i.e. you will spend less.
If you consider the economy as a whole, aggregate demand will fall, resulting in a decrease of aggregate supply, and an overall decrease of the GDP.
Answer:
a<u>.False.</u>
a<u>.True.</u>
Explanation:
It is correct to say that a country with more economic freedom during the last quarter of a century had a higher average GDP per capita than other countries with less freedom, this is due to the fact that the greater the economic freedom, the greater the economic growth of the country, which generates an increase in the country's productive capacity, increases demand, supply, the level of employability, the purchasing power of the population, which, integrated, these factors correspond to the increase in the country's quality of life, which increases the GDP per capita.
