1) A definitive list of leadership qualities has not been established by the strategy, and the list that has emerged appears to be endless.
2) Situations have not been taken into account by the strategy.
3) The meaning of the data is subject to a lot of subjective interpretation, and the data are not always based on reliable research.
What is a common criticism of personality trait theories?
Descriptive theories like trait theories try to pinpoint specific dimensions or traits of personality.People do not behave as consistently from one situation to the next as trait theories would typically predict, which is one of the main criticisms of trait theories.
Learn more about personality trait theories here:
brainly.com/question/25728564
#SPJ4
Answer:
According to him, the evil practices that dominated the Indian social life were religious intolerance, caste taboos and superstitious practices.
Answer: The team will organize, but the coach will run things like a dictator.
Explanation:
The human predicament cycle includes revolution, anarchy, competing groups, and tyranny.
The soccer team demanding change is going through a revolution, as a means to remove the tyranny of an overbearing coach.
The chaos that followed is a state of anarchy, without anyone in power. The different options represent the competing groups that fight for control. The economics teacher stepping in represents the new order that will likely end up being a tyranny.
When management implements a computerized information system (cis), this new endeavor is analogous to change; i.e., many individuals will: resist
Answer:
Member check
Explanation:
Member checking is a qualitative technique that is used to establish the truth of the research study’s findings. It also means a process that shows that the findings of a particular research are accurate and truthful.
Member checking also involves the process of getting and sharing the entire findings of the study with the research participants.
Member checking is the foundation to establishing trustworthiness with the participants of the research.
