Potential rate of return on investments and the level of risk are directly correlated. In general, if the level of risk of investment increases, the amount of potential return increases as well. As investors move up on the 'pyramid of investment risk' the chances of losing increase along with the amount of potential return.
This is a very philosophical question, so it requires your own opinions and reasoning. I will help as much as I can for you to develop your thoughts, but I cannot write them for you.
One of the most important things for you to reference in question two is the natural state of man. How was it like? Are we peaceful and individualistic, as John Locke states in <em>Two Treatise of Government</em>, or are humans selfish and natural life would be "nasty, brutish, and short" as Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes state in <em>The Prince </em>and <em>The Leviathan </em>(respective titles)? Why is this so?
These philosophers also give a reason as to why government is necessary for humankind. For Locke, it is to protect the people from larger threats. For Hobbes, it is to make man civilized. For Machiavelli, it is for a leader to align their self-interest with those of the people and make a prosperous community.
If you need any more help, ask me! I hope this helps :)
Answer:
1. Emotional paradox.
Explanation:
The paradox of the emotions refers to the disconnect, when we study emotions they appear self-evident and apparent and in objective scientific terms, they were exceedingly difficult to define. An individual think they know about an emotion when they see it, and because of it conclude that emotions are distinct phenomenons that can be detected with some degree of accuracy, but scientists still need to create a clear parameters to determine the presence of emotions.
The answer is B =Abraham Lincoln
