the answer is colombia cause I did the test! hope this helps!:) :) :)
The statement that best explains why the Supreme Court ruled in the students favor is A; The events involved symbolic speech without disruption. The Tinker v. Des Moines involved the suspension of three teenagers that wore armbands to school in support of protesting against the Vietnam War. The court ruling was that the students' free speech right was violated by the school district.
Answer:
The question does not provide the excerpt but I an safely answer the question.
Memory of the Tiananmen Square in China is largely suppressed. Very few records of the events exist today, and all of them only present the official government version of the events.
Most people born after 1989 do not even know about the Tiananmen square events, and if they do, it's likely that they knowledge is poor.
It is forbidden to discuss anything related to the Tiananmen square in public and in social media, doing so can get people jailed.
