Answer: scientific finding are based on carefully tested and scrutinized observation.
Explanation: All the statement tends to describe science, but the ones that describes it most is that scientific findings are based on carefully tested and scrutinized observation. Which means that before a scientist publish a finding, they must have been an observation of that finding, which lead him to come up with a hypothesis, then he goes into an experiment on that finding, after several carful experiment he will come up to a conclusion, that can be published as a finding, which is called a theory. If the theory had been proved in several phenomenon it became a natural law. That means before the first method used by scientist are observation, which will be carefully scrutinized and tested before it is published as a theory, then as a law.
Why other statement did not describe science the most are as follows.
• Science theories are concrete but not indisputable, because theories can always be amended by future scientist, using a higher technical apparatus in the same experiment.
• Science is not a process limited to only answering questions of the natural world,because science also answers questions of things to happen, which we can't see in the natural world.
• Scientific theories can never be made obsolete by new experiments or observation, but can only be amended by new theories.
• scientific finding are not always relied upon fact, but upon proven experiments.
• Science is limited by the type of question it can answer,because science can not answer some accounting question and many others.
