While both Greek and Romans were pretty ethnocentric by modern standards, the Romans assimilated far more people into their institutional lives.
Many non-Greeks adopted Gteek lifestyles, language and habits after the age of Alexander, but the cross-pollination was more frequently cultural than political. Cleopatra might have dressed like an Egyptian queen and patronized the Egyptian gods, but she wouldn't have had Egyptian generals or Egyptian judges. The Greeks tended to settle into the cultures they occupied like the British in India: remaining separate from and believing themselves superior to the people around them, even while encouraging the 'natives' to adopt their culture habits.
Romans did a much more thorough job assimilating the peoples they conquered. Non-Romans could and did become citizens, even from very early times. This started with neighboring groups like the Latins, but eventually extend to the rest of Italy and later to the whole empire. Eventually there would be "Roman" emperors of Syrian, British, Spanish, Gallic, Balkan, and North African descent Farther down the social scale the mixing was much more complete (enough to irritate many Roman traditionalists). This wasn’t just a practical accommodation, either — when emperor Claudius allowed Gauls into the Roman Senate he pointed out that by his time the Romans had been assimilating former enemies since the days of Aeneas.
<h2>Answer: Gospel of John
</h2>
In the Gospel of John, the apostle Thomas (<em>taoma </em>twin in Aramaic) is reported as Dydimus, which in koine Greek (the Greek spoken at the time the gospel was written) also means "twin."
As an example, we can read in this mentioned gospel its 11th chapter and 16th verse (according to the New International Version)
:
<em>"Then Thomas (also known as </em><u><em>Didymus</em></u><em>) said to the rest of the disciples, 'Let us also go, that we may die with him.' "</em>
Answer:
They been together since November 2020.
They relied on Forts Jackson and St. Philip, and helped with defense of them.
In their views was to protect and preserve slavery. This is the reason why they helped the union in Civil War.
Answer:
It is a good with a negative cross elasticity of demand
Explanation:
