<u>Explanation:</u>
First, remember that the difference between <em>normative and positive economic analysis</em> is that;
Normative analysis take a somewhat neutral view by stating how the world should be. While
The Positive analysis states the facts. That is, it describes the world as it is.
<u>
Thus, a </u><u>Normative analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
c. In some cities such as San Francisco and New York, it would be impossible for low−skilled workers to live comfortably in the city without minimum wage laws.
d. The gains to winners of a minimum wage law should be valued more highly than the losses to losers because the latter primarily comprises businesses.
<u>And a </u><u>Positive analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
a. The minimum wage law causes unemployment.
b. A minimum wage law benefits some groups and hurts others.
Banks lend money from saving accounts to people who need loans
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that when allocating funds, the firm should probably assign the highest cost of capital to division Z because it is most likely the riskiest of the three divisions. This is because Division Z focuses on research and development which means that they might not actually discover or create something that can bring value to the company and is therefore highly risky.
Answer:
Daadsasdjahishsbksnsbidje
Indeed, most economists would argue that the best interests of international businesses are served by a <u>free-trade stance</u>.
<h3>What is a free-trade stance?</h3>
A free-trade stance is a government policy that does not restrict imports and exports because there are no import tariffs or export subsidies.
A free-trade stance is also known as laissez-faire policy because under a free-trade policy, goods and services are exchanged across international borders with little or no government interventions in the forms of tariffs, quotas, subsidies, or prohibitions.
Trade protectionism, which creates economic isolationism, is the direct opposite of the concept of free trade.
Thus, indeed, most economists would argue that the best interests of international businesses are served by a <u>free-trade stance</u>.
Learn more about the free-trade stance at brainly.com/question/10608502