Explanation:
In this case, Nike is incorporating corporate governance into its business model, which is defined as a model for managing companies using the best market practices, using transparency, equity and social and environmental responsibility as essential parameters.
Companies today are no longer perceived by society as merely profitable entities, it is a social demand that companies assist in the development of society and minimize their impacts on the environment.
When companies develop programs to support society and sustainability, it guarantees the advantages of being better positioned in the market, attracting more investors, adding more value to its products and services and gaining a strategic and competitive advantage in the market.
Answer: C. is unreliable.
Explanation:
Kevin has signed the purchase agreement at fair price with good quality. However, the products arrived one month late which disrupted the production, it made Kevin feels that the <u>supplier is unreliable</u> because of the <em>unscheduled delay of steel frames</em>.
An example of a study that has a false correlation caused by a lurking variable is " research scientist examines the influence of diet and exercise on a an individual's blood pressure."
<h3>What is a lurking variable in a study?</h3>
Lurking variable is known to be a kind of a variable that is said not be the explanatory variable nor can it be called the response variable but it is one that is seen to have a relationship (e.g. correlation) with the response and that of the explanatory variable.
Note that A lurking variable is one that can be falsely identify as a strong relationship that exist between variables or it is one that often hide the true relationship.
Hence, An example of a study that has a false correlation caused by a lurking variable is " research scientist examines the influence of diet and exercise on a an individual's blood pressure."
Learn more about lurking variable from
brainly.com/question/13285819
#SPJ1
Answer:
$42,500
Explanation:
Given that,
Beginning total assets = $400,000
Ending total assets = $450,000
Average total assets = (Beginning total assets + Ending total assets) ÷ 2
= ($400,000 + $450,000) ÷ 2
= $425,000
Return on assets = 10%
Net Income ÷ Average total assets = 0.1
Net Income ÷ $425,000 = 0.1
Net Income = 0.1 × $425,000
= $42,500
Therefore, the Sub America's net income for the year is $42,500.