NOTE: Your question isn't clear, Johnson. Would you mind checking it and writing it in a way you can be better helped?
Meanwhile, I hope these explanation below helps.
Answer and Explanation:
Two goods are said to be complementary goods if an increase in the price of a particular one leads to a commensurate decrease in the demand that buyers placed for the other one.
A good is said to be a normal good if the reason for an increase in demand is due to an increase in the income of the buyers.
A good is said to be an inferior good if there is a decrease in demand even though the buyers have experienced increase in their income.
The correct answer to this is either generalizing or generalizabilty. Both mean the same and can be used interchangeably. It is basically an ability to generalize something based on a specific finding. It's not only on a broader group though, as it can also be done for its impact on natural environments based on a smaller finding.
The circumstance is called Conflict of Interest. It is a circumstance in which a man or association is engaged with various interests, money related or else, one of which could degenerate the inspiration or basic leadership of that individual or association.
Answer:
If MPC is 0.8, Change in GDP = $500 million
If MPC is 0.95, Change in GDP = $2,000 million
Explanation:
<em>Expenditure Multiplier is the amount by which the real GDP will change if autonomous expenditure changes by a given amount.</em>
It is calculated as follows: 1/(1-MPC).
MPC is the portion of additional income that is spent. If the MPC is 0.8, then the expenditure multiplier will be = 1/(1-0.8) = 5
Using the first scenario with an increase in government spending by $100million, the resulting change in GDP would be
Change in GDP = change in autonomous expenditure × Multiplier
= 100 × 5 = $500 million
<em>Scenario 2, MPC of 0.95</em>
Expenditure Multiplier = 1/(1-0.95) = 20
Change in GDP= 100 × 20 = $2000 million
