Answer: Tina doesn't have a standing
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, we are told that Consumer Goods Corporation sells products that are poorly made.
We are further told that Tina, who has never bought a product from Consumer Goods, files a suit against the firm alleging that its products are defective.
The firm could ask for dismissal of the suit on the basis that Tina doesn't have a standing. This is because Tina has never bought their goods before and therefore shouldn't be alleging that the product of the company is bad. Assuming Tina has bought their products before, then it'll have been harder for the firm to ask for dismissal.
It is a <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.
<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>
Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:
<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>
See the link below for more about Arbitration:
brainly.com/question/1139969
Answer: Floating exchange rate
Explanation: The floating exchange rate is a mechanism under which a country's exchange prices are set by the supply and demand-based foreign exchange market compared to other currencies. It compares with a fixed exchange rate, wherein the government decides the rate completely or mainly.
Floating currency regimes mean that lengthy-term currency price movements represent relative economic power and country-to-country rate of interest differences.
A currency that is too high or low may have a negative impact on the country's economy, impacting trade and debt-paying efficiency. The state or banking system would try to take action to bring their currencies towards a more desirable level.
The Erie canal was able to connect industries and consumers in the east with c. Midwestern farmers.
The Erie Canal:
- Was completed in 1825
- Connected New York City and the Great Lakes
- Allowed for goods to be shipped to and from the New York to the Great Lakes
The Great Lakes were accessible to farmers in the midwestern region and after the Erie Canal was built, farmers were able to send their produce via the Great Lakes and through the Erie Canal to New York City where it could be purchased by industries and people or shipped internationally.
In conclusion, the Erie canal was very important to midwestern farmers as it increased their reach.
<em />
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/6499420. </em>
Options for this question include:
a. Southern planters
b. Canadian fur traders
c. Midwestern farmers
d. New England fishers
