Answer:
Honestly we (homo sapiens) made alot of improvements through the last decade, is mildly concerning on how fast we grown and what we have now compared 20 years ago, we're now relying on small portable devices to keep us occupied, and now a major part of our lives, but we also have better meds, devies to help people and new treatments which save lifes, I a teen born from the mid 2000's Find it odd growing up now depending on a phone to help me out and stuff, but just a few years ago I never bother with screen entertainment, I used to play in the mud its changed so much in the past few years its amazing to me but again cornering if we'll be relying too much on devices
Impact. John Cabot had both a positive and a negative impact on both European and indigenous societies. ... But as for Cabot, he had not found any materials that could be of use but he did find land. This was not very pleasing to the King of England but he still allowed for more expedition
Answer:
Judicial, execuetive and Legislative
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
A) Pre-conventional stage.
Here, the decisions an individual might make when considering whether or not to cheat on an exam is directly related to external control. More specifically, is related to what the individual was taught in the family environment. What mom and dad taught you, In this stage, the children or the person remembers that he/she has to obey the rules imposed by an authoritative figure.
B) Conventional stage
In this stage, the individual has considerations about his personal and social experiences. He/she makes decisions because the individual understands that positive decisions bring positive outcomes and vice versa. So that is why he/she thinks it is better not to cheat on the exam.
C) Post-conventional stage.
During this stage, the person considers more abstract concerns about what is right and what is wrong. The individual question the morality of the rules established. So here is more prone to cheat.
These three stages of Moral Development were developed by scientist Lawrence Kohlberg.
Answer:
placebo
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the cigarette without nicotine is a placebo. This term refers to a substance that has no chemical effects and is given to a patient or test subject instead of the actual drug, in order to compare the effects that it has to the individual in comparison to the effects of the individuals that take the actual drug. Which is what the researcher are doing in this scenario as they test the reactions that nicotine has on individuals with those that just think they are smoking a cigarette.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
