In the Mayflower Compact, those who signed it, also agreed to the creation of a society that would preserve order and to help them reach their goals. They agreed to create several laws, offices and constitutions that would aid the common good. They also agreed that the laws they created would be supreme and agreed to abide by them.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
so sorry not sure good luck
Explanation:
so sorry not sure good luck
This quote is from Cormac McCarthy's novel "All the Pretty Horses", written in 1992. It tells a story about a 16-years-old John Grady Cole who grew up on a ranch in Texas.
This quote portrays boy's love and passion for horses, but also his loneliness and feeling of abandonment. He made a bond with horses like no other. Horses defined him as a person and he wishes humans could be more like persons. In the previously mentioned citation, he emphasizes the understandment and coherence between the horses, as opposed to the conflicts and misunderstanding that is dominant between people. When he is in the state of dealing with a loss, he finds comfort in horses which he cannot find in people.
The correct answer is differences between social work practice and research
Explanation: Even if an area is understood objectively, there are major differences in that area in practice. Often people believe that everything that has been studied will be directly applied, but the truth is that many things of the practice are learned only in practice, questions of experience and other particular questions that only the practice will offer.
