1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesnalui [34]
3 years ago
8

In a study in Scotland (as reported by Devlin 2009), researchers left a total of 320 wallets around Edinburgh, as though the wal

lerts were lost. Each contained contact information including an address. Of the wallets, 146 were returned by the people who found them. With the following steps, use the data to estimate the proportion of lost wallets that are returned, and give a 95% confidence interval for this estimate.
Required:
a. What is the observed proportion of wallets that were returned (rounded to the nearest thousandths)?
b. Calculate p to use in the Agresti-Coull method of calculating a 95% confidence interval for the population proportion rounded to the nearest thousandths).
c. Calculate the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (rounded to the nearest thousandths)
d. Calculate the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (rounded to the nearest thousandths)
Mathematics
1 answer:
Ann [662]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a) The observed proportion of wallets that were returned

  p = 0.45625

b) <em> 95% of confidence intervals for Population proportion</em>

<em>  0.40168  , 0.51082)</em>

<em>c) The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval = 0.40168</em>

<em>d) The upper bound of the 95% confidence interval = 0.51082</em>

Step-by-step explanation:

<u><em>Step(i)</em></u>:-

a)

Given data the  researchers left a total of 320 wallets around Edinburgh, as though the wallets were lost. Each contained contact information including an address. Of the wallets, 146 were returned by the people who found them

Given sample size 'n' = 320

  Given data          'x ' = 146

<em>Sample proportion </em>

              p = \frac{x}{n}

             p = \frac{x}{n} = \frac{146}{320} = 0.45625

<u><em>Step(ii)</em></u>:-

b)<em> </em><u><em>95% of confidence intervals for Population proportion</em></u>

Level of significance = 95% or 0.05%

Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } = Z_{\frac{0.05}{2} } = Z_{0.025} = 1.96

<em>95% of confidence intervals for Population proportion are determined by</em>

<em></em>(p - Z_{0.025} \frac{\sqrt{p(1-p)} }{\sqrt{n} } , p + Z_{0.025} \frac{\sqrt{p(1-p)} }{\sqrt{n} })<em></em>

<em></em>(0.45625 - 1.96\frac{\sqrt{0.45625(1-0.45625)} }{\sqrt{320} } , 0.45625 + 1.96\frac{\sqrt{0.45625(1-0.45625)} }{\sqrt{320} })<em></em>

<em>(0.45625 - 0.05457 , 0.45625 + 0.05457)</em>

<em>(   0.40168  , 0.51082) </em>

<em>c) The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval = 0.40168</em>

<em>d) The upper bound of the 95% confidence interval = 0.51082</em>

You might be interested in
1 divided 5/12=-3/10
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

t = - 1/8

Step-by-step explanation:

t ÷ 5/12 = - 3/10

t × 12 ÷ 5 = - 3/10

12t/5 = - 3/10

12t × 10 = -3 × 5

120t = - 15

t = - 15/120

t = - 1/8

Thus, t divided 5/12 = - 3/10 => -1/8

<u>-TheUnknown</u><u>S</u><u>c</u><u>ientist</u>

4 0
3 years ago
On a coordinate plane, the points are (3, 1), (6, 2), (8, 3), (12, 4).
ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

it would be 8 to 3

which is not equivalent

Step-by-step explanation:

the reason why is because of this

3, 6, 9, 12.

not:

3, 6, <em>8, </em>12.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Bethany wrote the equation X+ (x+2)+(+4)= 91 when she was told that the sum of three consecutive odd integers had a
azamat

Answer:

Option A) Bethany is correct because consecutive odd integers will each have a difference of two

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of 3 consecutive odd integers is 91. Let the first odd integer is x. The next odd integer will be obtained by adding 2 in x i.e. (x + 2). The third odd integer will be obtained by adding 2 in the second odd integer i.e. (x + 2) + 2 = x + 4

So, the 3 odd integers will be:

x  , (x+2) and (x+4)

Their sum is given to be 91. So we can write:

x + (x+2) + (x+4) = 91

Hence, we can conclude that: Bethany is correct because consecutive odd integers will each have a difference of two.

Other options are not correct because consecutive odd integers always increase by 2. For example, the next odd integer after 1 is 3, which is obtained by adding two, similarly the next odd will be 5 and so on.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Solve for x NEED HELP
lana [24]

Answer:

about 16.571

...............

5 0
3 years ago
What property is shown in the equation? . . . . 7ab ∙ 1 = 7ab. . . . A.. associative property of multiplication. . . B.. commuta
Andreas93 [3]
Identity property of multiplication is the one among the following choices in question that is shown in the equation 7ab . 1 = 7ab. the correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope it helps you.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Everbank Field, home of the Jacksonville Jaguars, is capable of seating 76,867 fans. The revenue for a particular game can be mo
    14·1 answer
  • Is anyone able to explain this step by step for next questions also thank you.
    14·1 answer
  • The College Board reported the following mean scores for the three parts of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) (The World Almana
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone please actually help me with this?<br> Images Below
    15·1 answer
  • The circumference of a hula hoop is<br> 86π cm<br> What is the radius of the hula hoop?
    9·2 answers
  • Please help me!!! 2 1/7:(1.5a)=5/14:0.8
    14·1 answer
  • How many natural numbers from 78 to 24?
    6·1 answer
  • Answer this question to get marked as brainliest!!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Felipe, Pedro y Miguel son fanáticos del cine. Felipe asiste cada 3 días; Pedro cada 6 días y Miguel cada 5 días. Los tres van j
    6·1 answer
  • Will mark the correct answer brainliest
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!