Answer:
The following have been discovered to be of help in reducing stress for law enforcement and public safety officials such as the Police and Military.
- Attaining and maintaining work-life balance
- deliberately taking out time for leisure activities
- Keeping a very positive mindset always
- setting and pursuing after goals and avoiding procrastination
- Planning their daily work for enhanced effectiveness
Explanation:
Stress amongst law enforcement officials and public safety officials has become very crucial due to the following reasons:
1. It's easy for stress to go on for a prolonged period of time in the lives of these officials because of the nature of their work.
2. They are always in the face of danger and have to take life-or-death decisions/risks very often.
3. Relative inconclusive nature of their work
4. Frequent changes in shifts
5. Financial challenges and
6. In some cases health challenges of the officers in question or loved ones.
Stress amongst Law enforcement officials are very difficult to track because as they are trained to be and look tough...hence a the thinking is that a demonstration of weakness or admission of challenges could be interpreted as incompetence or inability to continue on the job.
Cheers!
Answer: applicants are given a math test
Explanation: I just did it
Answer:
(a)
Dr. Cr.
Feb 1
Investment $7,200
Cash $7,200
Jul 1
Cash $600
Dividend Income $600
Sep 1
Cash $4,300
Gain on sale $700
Investment $3,600
(b) Dividend will be shown as other income in the revenue section of Income statement. Gain on sale of common share will be reported on income statement after operating profit.
Explanation:
Per Share Purchase Price = 7200 / 600 = $12
300 Shares Purchase Price = $12 x 300 = 3,600
Answer:
the answer is sourcing of raw materials
it depends if it is direct or indirect
Answer:
The answer is: integrity based ethics
Explanation:
Integrity based code of ethics define the company's values, aspirations, and conduct. When using an integrity based approach, the company usually allows its employees to interpret its values and the way wrongdoers should be penalized.
In this case, the company's management didn't decide that Rob's colleague did something wrong, the whole group of employees (his other colleagues) determined that it was foul-play and took actions.