1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
3 years ago
9

How was the absolute rule of Peter the Great, Frederick II, and Catherine the Great different from the absolutism of earlier Eur

opean monarchs? How was it similar?
History
1 answer:
aev [14]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The absolute rule of Peter the Great, Frederick II and Catherine the Great was different from the absolutism of earlier European monarchs in that they had a little bit more interested in the welfare of their people, and were not as self-centered as the many European monarchs of the time. They were more open to listening to ideas that could benefit them but also their servants.

They were similar to the other Kings and Queens of Europe in that they exerted their power and control over their territories. They were absolute Kings or Queens and imposed absolutist measures to consolidate their reigns.  

You might be interested in
What is special about Marbury versus Madison
Ivanshal [37]
It gave the judicial branch of government the ability to confirm if the bills that congress or the president pass are constitutional or if they follow the unalienable rights we have
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the federalist mayor arguments? (NOT ANTI)​
Vinvika [58]

Answer:

Explanation:

The main arguments for federalism is that it prevents tyranny, it encourages people to take part in politics and it promotes democracy. Arguments against federalism include citizens being too ignorant to make pragmatic decisions, a lack of accountability due to political mismanagement and withdrawing powers from the states.

7 0
3 years ago
Hey can anyone pls pls answer dis!!!
aleksandrvk [35]

Answer:

According to the Three-Fifths Compromise, the South would be well represented in the House of Representatives and would have disproportionate influence in electing Presidents.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
(I WILL MARK BRAINLIST)why is it important to have a peaceful transition of power in order to ensure democracy? i need answers b
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

it is 7:09am and iiuuum tiredd i neeeeeed sllllleeeeepppp

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
How were americans able to know about japanese plans against the united states in the pacific?
arsen [322]
<span>because the Japanese left tiny clues for the other Japanese to find but instead the American found it</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some factors that motivated Europeans to participate in the crusades?? 
    13·1 answer
  • What similarities do Hitler, Mussolini have as leaders?
    14·1 answer
  • To what extent were the ideals of the American Revolution realized in the first 100 years?​
    12·1 answer
  • Write a 7 sentence paragraph briefly summarizing what the Cuban Missile Crisis was all about.
    7·1 answer
  • What is history of new york 1691
    10·2 answers
  • HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • What were the characteristics of the Tokugawa era in Japan? Check all that apply. The country pursued a policy of isolation. The
    6·1 answer
  • Which phrase could be used to accurately complete the diagram?
    12·2 answers
  • Fill in the blank with the right answer.
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a responsibility of the Governor of Virginia?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!