Edgar Allen Poe's validity and reliability on the Spanish Inquisition can be made clearly through the text in "The Pit and the Pendulum". The narrator is valid because his story relates to the history of the Spanish Inquisition but unreliable because of his mental state. The Koch Blog says, " During the reign of the Catholic Monarchs, several thousand new Christians were condemned..." The narrator in the story was judged, put through hell, and tortured enough that he just wanted to end his life. As John Calvin states, "The torture of a bad conscience is the hell of a living soul."
1. We have a chicken in our backyard that likes to eat corn. 2. I like to eat corn, but it is a little different. Or.... 1. In our backyard we have a chicken that likes to eat corn. 2. I like to eat corn, but it is a little different. I would say the second option is probably better if you are looking for the exact wording of the sentence given in the picture.
2. Summarizing
Explanation:
In <u>analyzing</u>, the content is examined methodically and in detail for interpretation.
<u>Summarizing</u> includes just a brief statement of the main point in the content.
<u>Paraphrasing</u> is the technique of expressing the main idea of the original content by using different words in order to have greater clarity.
<u>Quoting</u> is repeating the same words of the original content by giving credit to the author who originally wrote them.
<em>The technique used by Catherine is summarizing as she wrote just a brief statement in her report to give the main gist of the original content.</em>
