Answer:
The Church was the single most dominant institution in medieval life, its influence pervading almost every aspect of people's lives. Its religious observances gave shape to the calendar; its sacramental rituals marked important moments in an individual's life (including baptism, confirmation, marriage, the eucharist, penance, holy orders and the last rites); and its teachings underpinned mainstream beliefs about ethics, the meaning of life and the afterlife.
Explanation:
Answer:
Introduction. The ability to read and write is called literacy; its opposite is illiteracy. ... In some societies a person who can read the letters of the alphabet or read and write his or her own name is considered literate
<h3>LITERATE</h3>
- able to read and write
- Literacy, capacity to communicate using inscribed, printed, or electronic signs or symbols for representing language. Literacy is customarily contrasted with orality (oral tradition), which encompasses a broad set of strategies for communicating through oral and aural media. In real world situations, however, literate and oral modes of communication coexist and interact, not only within the same culture but also within the very same individual. (For additional information on the history, forms, and uses of writing and literacy, see writing.)
<h3>ILLITERATE</h3>
- not able to read and write
- having little or no education
especially : unable to read or write
- showing or marked by a lack of acquaintance with the fundamentals of a particular field of knowledge
- violating approved patterns of speaking or writing
- showing or marked by a lack of familiarity with language and literature
Answer:
People might have different views, is this a multiple paragraph question???
Explanation:
Answer:
B The ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication.
Explanation:
The court will base its decision on its determination that the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. While the First Amendment protects the freedoms of speech and assembly, the government may reasonably regulate speech-related conduct in public forums through content‑neutral time, place, and manner regulation. Here, the ban on camping overnight in the park, a content-neutral regulation of a public forum, would be evaluated by the court based on if the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. In this scenario, the question would be if the ban on the use of the park will limit alternative channels of communicating the message of the scout leader and if yes the ban may be lifted and if not, it will not be lifted.