Answer:
A man accused of a crime in court, UNDER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT, has a right to: a speedy public trial; a lawyer whether appointed or bought by the defendant; an impartial jury; who the accusers are; know the charges brought against the accused; and the evidence found.
Explanation:
Under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, any man or woman accused of a crime has a right to: a speedy and public trial; a court appointed or self obtained counsel (lawyer); an impartial jury (one that holds no bias against the defendant); know who the accuser(s) are (also known as the prosecution); know the charges brought against the defendant; and to know the evidence found.
Fort Sumter April 12, 1861: The fort is best know as the site where the shots that started the American Civil War were fired.
Fort Sumter is on Charleton Harbor. Major Robert Anderson surrendered the fort and evacuated the next day.
Battle & Capture of New Orleans
April 13, 1862:
Lee's army was surrounded, weak, and exhausted. He had decided that surrender would be best because he knew it wouldn't be a good turnout. This was important to the civil war because it meant that it was finally over.
Lee Surrenders to Grant
April 9, 1865:
The Battle of Antietam,also known as Battle of Sharpsburg, was the first major battle of the American Civil War on union soil. It was important because it was the battle where Lincoln decided to issue the Emancipation Proclamation. He was waiting for a union victory so it wouldnt come across as desperate.
Battle of Monitor & Merrimack
March 8, 1862: The battle of Monitor and Merrimack, also known as battle of Hampton Roads, was most noted and arguably most important navel battle of the American Civil War, because it was the first.
Emancipation Proclamation
January 1, 1863
The Emancipation Proclamation declared all slaves free, however not all southerners would allow that. Lincoln actually had to issue it twice, the second time it was added to the 13th amendment which a year later completely freed the slaves.
Answer:
It should be personification
Explanation:
Personification is when unhuman/nonliving things are described with human characteristics.
"the wind whispered" is personification
Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
Answer:
The investigador should: Discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drug and the commercially available drug and then allow the subject to decide whether to withdraw from the research to take the new drug.
Explanation:
An investigator's ethical duty, is to keep the subject of investigation, well informed with all the details about the invesigation. At a phase 2 of the study the subject suposposedly has been informed of the prosedure, following the informed consent. So in this particular case the investigator has to present all the new information so the subject can decide for himself what is best for him.
During phase II of an investigation, it is necessary to evaluate the benefits or negative aspects of a drug, to ensure the safty and wellbeing of the subject. If a drog is known to harm a subject, the procedure would stop. In this phase is important to have the data to decide and discuss what is best for the subject.
