Answer: C
Explanation:
Though the North would eventually outlaw slavery, they did benefit from it for a time. The civil war was about more than slavery. The south had a prospering economy because of cotton exports that were earned off the backs of slaves. The north, wanting a piece of that action asked the southerners for more taxes on exports. The south refused. So the north did it anyways, the south pulls out of the union, so the north says "If you wont give us taxes, we will free your workforce..." Or something along those lines. The north is often portrayed as heroes to the slaves, but really, they just wanted money. If you research how slaves who escaped to the north and fought for the union were treated, you will see that the north wasn't a bunch of choir boys.
<span> Pizarro seized the Inca emperor,Atahualpa,massacred the senior Inca nobility,extracted a huge ransom in gold and silver for Atahualpa,then murdered him.Pizarro then went on to conquer an effectively leaderless Inca empire.
Much the same with Cortes and the Aztecs - initially pretending to be friendly,Cortes seized the Aztec emperor,extracted a huge ransom for him before murdering him and,although forced to retreat shortly after by superior numbers,soon returned with Mexican native allies to destroy the Aztec empire and conquer it for Spain.
Cortes' conquest was much harder fought than that of Pizarro,but basically their interaction with the natives was the same - kidnap th leader,extort a ransom,kill the hostage anyway,then attack and conquer their people.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there were no options attached, we can say the following.
The production by England's Punchdrunk company that was a breakout hit of the 2011-12 season in New York and is considered the leading example of the new genre, the immersive theatre was "Sleep No More."
We are talking about England's Punchdrunk company adaption of William Shakespeare's "McBeth," a classic tragedy that has transcended the test of time.
The premiere of this play was in London, in 2003, and it came to the United States in 2009, in Boston, Massachusetts. This adaptation is very special because there are no seats. The rooms used in the play can be accessed by the public, creating a special sense of participation in the play.
Answer:
d.acted properly in this case
Explanation:
The court acted properly in fining the company as well, the company has the obligation to examine the conducts of its employee and ensure they are ethical. Hence, for the companies failure in carrying out the oversight function, the company is implicit in the criminal conduct of Sarah.
