Answer: Non-destructive
Explanation:
Non-destructive means it has no effect on disrupting the work. This is what Carl Rogers's person-centered approach is considered on.
Answer:
British and France take over Egypt and controlled Egyptian railways, ports, finances, etc.
Explanation:
The Suez Canal played a crucial role in conducting international trade and colonizing Africa by Several European powers. The Suez Canal connected the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean. An economic and political crisis in 1882 led the British to conquest Egypt. France also followed the example of Britain when Egypt fell in debt-driven by modernization projects in the country.
Gross national happiness is a proportion of financial and good progress that the King of Bhutan presented during the 1970s as a choice to total national output. Instead of concentrating carefully on quantitative monetary measures, net domestic bliss considers an advancing blend of personal satisfaction factors
Gross domestic happiness bliss is abused. It covers issues with debasement and low expectations for everyday life in the entire nation, as indicated by the nation's new head administrator.
Answer:
Nature and Nurture
Explanation:
Both Trevor and Bill have undergone similar treatment in their childhood; while Trevor took it as positive to redeem himself Bill remained in the quagmire of negativity, never forgot the abuses against him and decided to pay back in the same coin. It was the nature of Trevor that allowed him to challenge the problem by nurturing himself towards a better life. Trevor learnt a lesson out of abuses inflicted upon him that he would help those underwent similar treatment. It was Bill's nature upon which childhood abuses helped nurture even more vices. While Trevor continued to recall the abuses meted out to him for the betterment, Bill liked to forget it via drugs and idleness. While nature and nurture transformed Trevor to be a better person, it put Bill in the worse condition.
The term “sense of ownership” is frequently cited as a significant characteristic of community development. While there is increasing use of the terms ownership or sense of ownership, there is a paucity of research regarding what these terms mean, how this body of knowledge influences community development, and the various approaches that can be applied in contemporary community research and practice. A sense of ownership in community development is described as a concept through which to assess whose voice is heard, who has influence over decisions, and who is affected by the process and outcome. Applying the concept of ownership can determine how the strategic interests and actions of individuals or organizations contribute to community development efforts. In addition, the potential for ownership can be understood in part by examining the capacity for and quality of trust. Implications are discussed regarding how the concept of ownership advances the current field, specifically regarding community development research and practice.
