C. 6.2g can be combined with -3/8y. This is because they both end in ‘y’.
Answer:
24 sq.units is the answer
Answer:
<H=<J
Step-by-step explanation:
Because they r corresponding angles so they are congruent. the rest of the statements r incorrect.
First we dra a triangle:
To prove that the triangles are similar we have to do the following:
Considet triangles ABC and ACD, in this case we notice that angles ACB and ADC are equal to 90°, hence they are congruent. Furthermore angles CAD and CAB are also congruent, this means that the remaining angle in both triangles will also be congruent, therefore by the AA postulate for similarity we conclude that:

Now consider triangles ABC and BCD, in this case we notice that angles ACB and BDC are congruent since they are both equal to 90°. Furthermore angles ABC and DBC are also congruent, this means that the remaining angle in both triangles will, once again, be congruent. Hence by the AA postulate we conclude that:

With this we conclude that traingles BCD and ACD are both similar to triangle ABC, and by the transitivity property of similarity we conclude that:

Now that we know that both triangles are similar we can use the following proportion:

this comes from the fact that the ratios should be the same in similar triangles.
From this equation we can find h:
![\begin{gathered} \frac{h}{x}=\frac{y}{h} \\ h^2=xy \\ h=\sqrt[]{xy} \end{gathered}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bgathered%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bh%7D%7Bx%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7By%7D%7Bh%7D%20%5C%5C%20h%5E2%3Dxy%20%5C%5C%20h%3D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7Bxy%7D%20%5Cend%7Bgathered%7D)
Plugging the values we have for x and y we have that h (that is the segment CD) has length:
![\begin{gathered} h=\sqrt[]{8\cdot5} \\ =\sqrt[]{40} \\ =\sqrt[]{4\cdot10} \\ =2\sqrt[]{10} \end{gathered}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bgathered%7D%20h%3D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B8%5Ccdot5%7D%20%5C%5C%20%3D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B40%7D%20%5C%5C%20%3D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B4%5Ccdot10%7D%20%5C%5C%20%3D2%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B10%7D%20%5Cend%7Bgathered%7D)
Therefore, the length of segment CD is:
At first glance, it seems like a good estimate; big numbers make bigger number.
But, this is multiplication, which means big numbers will make an extraordinarily big number, in proportion to the numbers themselves.
If you round 31 3/4 up to 32, you can multiply that by 50. To make the estimate easier, multiply 50 by 2,
50 x 2 = 100
Take the zeros off 50 and 30 to make this a bit simpler, and multiply 5 by 3,
5 x 3 = 15
Add each of the zeros you took off to the 15 to make 1500 (1 zero was taken off 50, and 1 off of 30),
And then add 1500 to that other 100
1500 + 100 = 1600
A good estimate for 50 x 31 3/4 would be 1600, not 800.
Therefore,
No. Brenda's estimate of 800 is NOT a good estimate.