Answer: Heyaa! :)
→ income not spent, or deferred consumption. Methods of saving include putting money aside in
- <em>Checking Account</em>
Offers easy access to your money for your daily needs ←
<em>The main difference between checking and savings accounts is that </em>checking accounts actually used on the daily <em>while</em> savings accounts are primarily for saving money.
Hopefully this helps <em>you !</em>
- Matthew ~~
The answer is; Purchasing Power Parity.
<em>Hope this helped! :)</em>
Answer:
The answer is: Following the expected value criterion the investor should choose indistinctively between the conservative or neutral alternatives.
Explanation:
The formula we use to calculate the expected return value of the different alternatives is:
ERV = ∑ (expected return x probability of occurrence)
The conservative alternative has an expected return value of of 4.5%
ERV Conservative = (6% x 25%) + (4% x 75%) = 4.5%
The neutral alternative also has an expected return value of of 4.5%
ERV Neutral = (12% x 25%) + (4% x 75%) = 4.5%
The aggressive alternative has an expected return value of of -1%
ERV Aggressive = (20% x 25%) + (-8% x 75%) = -1%
Answer:
Option (a) and (b) are considered or correct.
Explanation:
Under the following two conditions, a firm in a perfectly competitive market produces at a point where the marginal revenue is equal to the marginal cost:
(i) Minimum AVC < Price < minimum ATC : Yes
In this case, a firm may suffer a loss but it will be able to cover its minimum average variable cost. Hence, this firm continue operating in this market and if he shut down its operation then he may suffer a larger loss. Therefore, it chooses to continue operating under this market conditions.
(ii) Price > minimum ATC : Yes
In this case, the price received by the seller is greater than the minimum average total cost. Therefore, the firm is able to cover all of its cost of production and earning an economic profit. Hence, it obviously chooses to continue its operation.
The third option is not considered here because in this case, the firm won't be able to cover its variable cost.
Answer:
The annual financial disadvantage is $62,560
Explanation:
<u>Analysis of the Costs of Producing Internally and Buying from External Supplier.</u>
Producing Internally External Supplier
Direct materials $3.50 $0
Direct labor $8.10 $0
Variable manufacturing overhead $8.60 $0
Supervisor's salary $4.00 $0
Depreciation of special equipment $2.40 $0
Allocated general overhead $7.60 $7.60
Extra contribution $0 ($2.19)
Purchases Cost $0 $32.70
Product Cost $34.20 $38.11
<u>Conclusion :</u>
We can see that the Product Cost to produce the part internally costs $3.91 less than the cost to purchase from external supplier. Therefore Sewtfi861 Corp has a disadvantage.
Annual disadvantage = 16,000 units × $3.91
= $62,560
