Answer:
China receives fewer benefits
Explanation :
China receives fewer benefits because they still enslave people while most countries don't enslave anymore
"Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Answer:
D. decide on how their tax dollars are spent
Social--youth culture v. traditional culture; temperance v. bootlegging; "native" Americans v. foreign influence/minorities; urban v. rural.
Economic--regulation of the economy v. no regulation; unions or not
Religious--fundamentalism v. modernism (secular thinking)
The 1920s presented a time of change and the US was polarized on the ideas of the time. Should we return to a time of "normalcy" (before WWI) or should be keep going forward and progressing?
Answer:
To inform Roman authorities that, in the future, Christianity would be considered illegal
Explanation:
I just took this test I hope this helps :)
