<u>Solution: </u>
The following are the correct and incorrect options
<u>Correct option</u>: Households used to save and those savings are utilized for investment through the intermediaries like bank. Firms and governments take those funds for their investment acts.
<u>Correct option</u>: Foreigner can invest in the US (suppose foreign direct investment) but can’t save here, since there is difference in currency (suppose a foreigner earns in pond can’t save in US dollar).
<u>Other options are not correct:
</u>
<u>Incorrect option</u>: Savings means personal savings, which are not yet kept into a bank.
<u>Incorrect option</u>: such purchases are investments but not savings.
Answer: Option b
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to an arrangement under which one entity allows the other entity to use its procedures and brand name for the business in return of any loyalty or other such benefits.
In the given case, Gerald wants to operate his business globally and not eager to control all of it.
Hence from the above we can conclude that franchising is the best option for Gerald.
Answer: A. They are flat.
C. They are common to start-up businesses.
D. A single leader makes most decisions.
Explanation:
Entrepreneurial business structure is a structure whereby, the owner of the bsuniess makes every decisions. It is often a start up company or a small company and there's a direct mean of communication as the owner has few workers.
The structure is typically flat and the roles are not well defined. It also give rooms for promotion of ideas as workers can give opinions on certain issues.
Answer:
$8,300
Explanation:
Calculation for what Elroy's incremental profit or loss would be if he chooses option 2 over option 1
Using this formula
Incremental Profit of option 2 over option 1= Profit from option 1 - Profit from option 2
Let plug in the formula
Incremental Profit of option 2 over option 1= ($3,600*3)-(3*$1,100 - $800)
Incremental Profit of option 2 over option 1= $10,800 - $2,500
Incremental Profit of option 2 over option 1= $8,300
Therefore Elroy's incremental profit or loss would be if he chooses option 2 over option 1 would be $8,300
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In simple words, The given case is related to the conclusion made by the court in the famous case of Vokes versus Arthur MurrayLinks, in which the jury in the court rules that, a determination of a party carrying better information about a subject matter may be treated as a matter of fact even though it would be treated as an opinion if the parties were speaking for deal on equal conditions.