Answer:
b. No, the return is less than the required rate of 9%
Explanation:
Projected sale = 100000
Projected exp = 86000
Profit = 14000
Assets= 200000
Return on assets = 14000/200000 = 7%
Expected return = 9%
Hence, project should not be taken
Jenna used the vendor bid analysis
.
Option D
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Vendor Bid Analysis is the tool of evaluating the proposals received by many suppliers to determine the cost of such a project. This can be done by taking into account the risk provided for project works (through quotations, deals, proposals, etc.).
The buyer's side can take account of documents from existing agreements, meeting qualitative needs, capability and infrastructure, establishing time limits for records, financial capacity, and services when analyzing the offers of a good or service.
This is not an official offer to purchase the property, but rather a public declaration that the seller isn't satisfied with the last offer which is used to keep the deal on track.
I believe the answer is: Monopoly
In monopoly, the power to determine the price of a certain type of product fall to the hands of a single company. Which means, every single actions that made by this company would force other firms to conform since they do not possess enough resources to challenge this controlling company.
Answer:
The interpretation of the discussion is characterized throughout the explanation segment below.
Explanation:
- Concentrate on an investigation as well as implementation or enhancement as something with a category or manner of price-free competitive advantage.
- With more than just related diversification, there is much less inflationary pressure as well as the corporation or manufacturer should start concentrating on non-price competitive advantage throughout the opportunity to expand mostly on the supply chain.
So the answer here is just the appropriate one.
Answer:
Alan is better off by $15
Explanation:
the number of citizens in latvia = 10
if citizens were levied $10 each, total amount
= 10*10
=$100
each persons valuation = 100*0.25
= $25
$25 is also Alans valuation sice he is a part of this population.
since he contribited $10, his net gain would be
$25.00 - $10.00
= $15.00
Alan is better of by $15 in the tax system.
