Appeals are decided by panels of three judges working together. The appellant presents legal arguments to the panel, in writing, in a document called a "brief." In the brief, the appellant tries to persuade the judges that the trial court made an error, and that its decision should be reversed.
The discomfort we feel when two thoughts are inconsistent is called "Conspiracy" theory
Explanation:
Media and t.v stars are the role model of the public. The public has faith and belief in Movie and TV stars. When people watch violence on tv and videos, it affects them personally because their ideal star is performing that act. But this relation does not show that watching violence is related to aggressive behavior. OTV, video, and media play a role model for the public.
If the public watch violence on tv or media they get influenced more than directly watching aggression. This it is not necessary that watching violence influences the aggressive behavior of people because of media.
The answer is "Backward chaining".
Backward chaining is a deduction technique generally utilized as a part of man-made reasoning, computerized hypothesis provers and evidence associates. Backward chaining approach can be portrayed as working again from an objective. It's a standout amongst the most ordinarily utilized strategies for prevailing upon impedance rules and intelligent implication. Backward chaining works in reverse from a rundown of objectives to decide if there is any information to help them.
