Answer:
Price of the stock will rise or increase
Explanation:
Efficient market hypothesis states that price of stock factors in all information related to the stock. As such, nobody can take advantage of higher returns offered by a particular stock for a long time.
In line with efficient market efficiency, if public expected a bigger loss of $5 but loss was only for $4, the price of stock will increase. Though the company still suffers a loss, it is less than what was expected by the market, resulting in increase in stock price.
Answer:
The aggregate budgeted selling expense for the month of February amounts to $20,900
Explanation:
Selling expense budget is the plan which estimate the selling expense which happen in that period or year or month. It is related to the marketing as well as selling the product to customers. And involve advertising expense, commission, delivery cost and signs.
The aggregate budgeted selling expense for the month of February is computed as:
Aggregate budgeted selling expense = Commission + Monthly Salary of Sales manager + Advertising expense
where
Commission is as:
Commission = Sales × 5%
= $318,000 × 5%
= $15,900
Monthly Salary of Sales manager is $3,700
Advertising expense is $1,300
So,
Aggregate budgeted selling expense = $15,900 + $3,700 + $1,300
Aggregate budgeted selling expense = $20,900
The capital of US is Washington,DC
Answer: The complete table is as follows:
Explanation:
The following are the formulas for calculating marginal product , total revenue and marginal revenue product:
Marginal product = 
Total revenue = Price × Quantity
Marginal revenue Product = Marginal product × Price
By using these formulas, I have completed the following table:
Answer:
The correct answer is: No, this situation is impossible.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the reality the situation with the demand curve is all the opposite. The <em>law of demand</em> establishes that there is an indirect relationship between the price of a product and its quantity demanded in the market, therefore that when the price of a good increases then its quantity demanded decreases. And it is by logic as well, because no one will buy more of something if the products is more expensive than it was before. Therefore that the situation in the text is impossible and it could only be opposite.
