Three judges sit on appeals courts, which do not employ juries. Whether or not the law was correctly applied in the trial court is something that the appellate court must decide.
The power of a court to rehear or reconsider a case determined by a lower court is referred to as appellate jurisdiction. The Supreme Court and High Courts of India both have appellate authority. They have the power to either reverse or sustain lower court rulings. To ensure that the proceedings were fair and the appropriate law was applied correctly, appellate courts examine the processes and rulings made by the trial court. The U.S. Supreme Court, the highest appellate court in the country, only considers appeals with significant weight and significance. There must be fundamental distinctions between trial and appellate courts, general and limited jurisdiction courts, and criminal and civil courts.
Learn more about appellate court here
brainly.com/question/29615850
#SPJ4
Answer:
It would be E because they need probable cause to search the house.
Explanation:
B would not be correct because to pass the security check you must be searched.
C would be incorrect because officers can Search/Pat anyone down that they have stopped without probable cause.
D is not correct as the owner gives consent
A is incorrect because School Administrators only need reasonable suspicion.
Well first you would need to know if the vet has any records of the dogs blood. Then you would also need to know if the they kidnapping victims doctor had samples of the victims blood. Then you would cross test the samples if the doctors had them to look for a match. !!! I AM NOT AN EXPERT THIS IS JUST WHAT I WOULD CONCLUDE !!!
