The antifederalists got the bill of rights in which gave them basic rights. In addition, the federalists approach to winning by nationwide network of support and they had more connections while the antifederalists they struggled to build alliances. Madison, Hamilton and John jay wrote the federalist.
One factor is that most European nations were just too poor after the war to carry the huge expenses of maintaining their colonies. Another is that many colonies were acquired strictly for strategic reasons, like coaling or controlling certain maritime trading routes, and they were simply no longer needed.
Answer:
No, the attorney is not subject to discipline. It is the legal responsibility of the attorney(Retained by the insurer) to advise the insurer accordingly should any case issues arise.
Explanation:
All the parties involved(The Insurer, the construction company and the attorney) have their respective responsibilities in the case issue.
The Insurer under normal situation must be responsible for the construction company, in case of any accident or loss, if the issuance application is adequately represented by the company
The company must represent the insurance application correctly. If the Insurance application is misrepresented, the Insurer reserve a legal right of refraining from its responsibilities to the construction company
The attorney's duty is to ensure if the insurance application is correctly respresented also defend the isurer's client(The construction company) legally. He/She discovering a misrepresention in insurance application by the construction company can advise the insurer that it had no obligation to provide coverage, and He/She is not subject to discipline by doing so.
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
