<span>Wheat
</span><span>Brown rice
</span><span>Maize
</span><span>Basmati
</span><span>White rice
</span><span>Potato
</span>Vegtables
Risotto
Onion
<span>Cereal
</span><span>Chicken meat
</span><span>Meat
</span><span>Steamed rice
</span>Glutinous rice
<span>Tomato
</span><span>Egg as food
</span><span>Pilaf
</span><span>Bread
</span><span>Sugar
</span><span>Cheese
</span><span>Soybean
</span><span>Millet
</span><span>Garlic
</span>Wild Rice
Answer:
cognitive dissonance theory.
Explanation:
Cognitive dissonance theory: This theory refers to a situation that involves a clash in the beliefs, attitudes, and behavior of an individual.
Example: A person smokes instead of knowing that smoking causes cancer.
If there is any inconsistency that occurs in the behavior and attitude of a person then cognitive dissonance occurs. And to remove dissonance, the attitude and behavior of a person must be similar.
Answer:
Group A did not work as hard or as well as group B and would be less likely to spontaneously work on similar puzzles in the future.
Explanation:
Over justification, effect is a psychological phenomenon where people tend to lose interest in an activity when intrinsic motivation is replaced by extrinsic rewards. person not only lose interest in an activity but less likely to engage in that activity. people tend to see that external reward as bribe to do that activity which was earlier they were doing for internal appeasement.
As per the question Group A is externally motivated to do work, it would unlikely that they engage in such a similar activity in the future.
One major difference is the cost. A private attorney costs the defendant money for their services. A public defender is free to people who do not have the means to afford their own attorney. Usually, the defendant does not have a choice with the public defender they are assigned.
