Answer:
No. The Romans did not commit genocide against the Gauls
Explanation:
Julius Ceaser's Gallic Wars occurred from 58 to 51 B.C. Gaul was invaded by the Romans mainly for money. Ceaser needed to pay off his debts and also wanted to keep making a name for himself, thus invading Gaul was the answer. He didn't care about the people who lived there nor did he ever discuss their culture, nationality, or race as being a reason for invading. If we look at the definition of genocide it's "the deliberate or systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group." Again, Ceaser never listed any of those as being a reason for invasion; all he needed was victories.
Answer:
d. Alexia attributes her friend's pitiable performance in the music concert to the poor sound system.
Explanation:
Situational attribution occurs when a person attributed the outcome of their own action to an external factors (anything beside themselves)
This can be seen in Alexia's action.
Rather than considering the possibilities that her friend lacks practices or not having a proper mindset, she attributed her friend's failure to the poor sound system (external factors)
Answer:
believed that neither the child nor the environment controlled development.
Explanation:
James mark Baldwin believed that nature and nurture all contributed in development. In other words, a kids environment affects his behaviours just in the same way hereditary factors and mental processes affects the child. None controlled development absolutely in this sense as development of a child is left in the way nature and nurture/environment interact in child's development
Answer: According to Tetlock argument, Expert with good predictive power should be willing to;
• EXPLORE DIVERSE INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL MODEL
• CHALLENGE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM
• BE COMFORTABLE WITH COMPLEXITY AND UNCERTAINTY.
Therefore option b,c,e is the right answer.
Explanation: The predictive power of a scientist is the power a scientist has to generate a testable prediction, thereby making its theory to be a testable prediction.
For an expert to have good predictive power it must have the ability to explore diverse information and analytical model, because when you explore different information and analyse it in the best form, you will be able to postulate more information and discoveries, which can help you to predict a testable theory. By exploring you are trying to challenge conventional wisdom, of why should this be this?, You may get confused and uncertain at a point. But if he you have a good predictive power, you can be able to absorb it all to achieve your discovery and produce a scientific theory with a predictive power.
Answer:
scale, legend, title, and compass
Explanation:
