Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer:
Women would react more to the threat of emotional infidelity
Men report they would react more to threat of sexual infidelity
Explanation:
If one person in a relationship has sex with someone else, this is known as infidelity. It does not matter whether emotions are attached or not (Sexual Infidelity). Furthermore, one partner developing a close relationship with an external person is also called infidelity; whether there is no physical intimacy involved (Emotional Infidelity). In forced choice question, men are said to react more to the first scenario, while women react more to second scenario.
Answer:
The answer is "Option b".
Explanation:
Logically, the replacement of rule is the rule of substitution that could only lead to a specific part of the logical expression, it is identical phrases will start replacing each other within the structure of valid logic.
- It is the probabilistic reasoning, replacement laws are applicable to manipulate initiatives.
- This rule of inference is being used only for the whole linear combination, that can be substituted by a rule of substitution.
James II become non-tolerant to Roman Catholicism wherein he sent 1200 to Barbados and killed 400 protestants. The incident placed his catholic friends in good positions.
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly.
