Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Debt = D ÷ (E + D)
= 0.8 ÷ (1 + 0.8)
= 0.4444
Now
Weight of equity = 1 - Debt
= 1 - 0.4444
= 0.5556
As per Dividend discount model
Price = Dividend in 1 year ÷ (cost of equity - growth rate)
40 = $2 ÷ (Cost of equity - 0.06)
Cost of equity = 11%
Cost of debt
K = N
Let us assume the par value be $1,000
Bond Price =∑ [(Annual Coupon) ÷ (1 + YTM)^k] + Par value ÷ (1 + YTM)^N
k=1
K =25
$804 =∑ [(7 × $1000 ÷ 100)/(1 + YTM ÷ 100)^k] + $1000 ÷ (1 + YTM ÷ 100)^25
k=1
YTM = 9
After tax cost of debt = cost of debt × (1 - tax rate)
= 9 × (1 - 0.21)
= 7.11
WACC = after tax cost of debt × W(D) + cost of equity ×W(E)
= 7.11 × 0.4444 + 11 × 0.5556
= 9.27%
As we can see that the WACC is lower than the return so it should be undertake the expansion
Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: False.
Explanation:
To begin with, the price discrimination strategy refers to a technique used by the companies in order to charge different prices to the different consumers regarding the fact of how much would they be able to pay for the product. When it comes to monopolies, a perfect price discrimination strategy would try as best as possible to capture the majority of the zone known as the <em>"consumer surplus"</em>. And that is why that a company with a perfect price discrimination would face a small deadweight loss area due to the fact that with that strategy of price the monopolist will absorve as much as possible of that area becuase the triangle is half consumer surplus and half producer surplus.
Answer:
1. Per se application - US Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of US competition law
2. Misuse of activity - EU Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of EU competition law
3. Extraterritoriality - US and EU
Justification: It is a provision of US and EU antitrust and competition law
4. Trade obstacle, non-tariff - France
Justification: These are considered to be part of the France trade system
5. Strict liability - U.S. Tort Law
Justification: It is part of the U.S. Tort Law and depends on intent to harm liability
6. Punitive damages - U.S. Product Liability Law
Justification: It is a provision of U.S. Product Liability Law
Hello there,
The answer to your question is shaping
Hope this helps :))
~Top
Interest on purchase consideration, the salary of partners, and interest on vendor capital are to be charged during the pre-incorporation period.
