It is more than just a quadrilateral. In fact it is going to be hard to pick.
These facts suit a square, a rectangle, a rhombus, and a parallelogram. And the above statement is true, but maybe a little harder to prove than the converse of the statement, which is the usual one you find.
The converse is "If you have a parallelagram, the diagonals bisect each other."
You might think a trapezoid deserves some mention. The diagonals of a trapezoid do not bisect each other.
Answer:
A. They will pay more with the new price plan.
B. The new price plan would be cheaper.
Step-by-step explanation:
A. They will pay more with the new price plan.
For the current price plan, you would add the $3 rent to the two games (which are $4 each). This basically means:
$3 + $4 + $4 = $11
For the new price plan, you would add the $11 rent to the two games (which are $2 each). This basically means:
$11 + $2 + $2 = $15
Therefore, you pay more for the new price plan.
B. Using similar logic as part A, the current price plan 7 games would cost:
$3 + [7 x ($4)] = $31 (multiply by 7 since they play 7 games)
For the newprice plan, 7 games would cost:
$11 + [7 x ($2)] = $25 (multiply by 7 since they play 7 games)
Therefore, the new price plan would be cheaper.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Distribute</u>




Answer: 
Answer:
The inverse is x-8
Step-by-step explanation:
g(x) = x+8
y = x+8
To find the inverse, exchange x and y
x = y+8
Solve for y
Subtract 8 from each side
x-8 = y+8-8
x-8 = y
The inverse is x-8
Answer:
$12.54
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you have to apply the sale to the original price. In this case, you would have to multiply 22 and 43% to get $9.46. Now, you have to subtract 9.46 from 22 to get 12.54.