Answer:
$50
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the intrinsic per share stock price be immediately after the repurchase
First step
Total Assets=Value of operations of 20,000+ Short term investments of 1000
Total Assets=$21,000
Second step
Equity =Assets - Debt
Equity= $21,000-$6,000
Equity= $15,000
Now let determine the intrinsic per share stock price
Intrinsic per share stock price=$15,000/300
Intrinsic per share stock price=$50
Therefore the Intrinsic value per share will be $50 immediately after the repurchase has occured.
Answer:
The most common reasons small businesses fail include a lack of capital or funding, retaining an inadequate management team, a faulty infrastructure or business model, and unsuccessful marketing initiatives.
Answer: Strategic Analysis.
Explanation: Strategic analysis is the process that firms use to study and understand the many different aspects of their competitive environment. This analysis involves the process that focus on researching an organization’s business environment within which it operates. It is an essential tool in formulating strategic planning for decision making and smooth working of the business organization.
Strategic analysis refers to the process of conducting research on a company and its operating environment within which its operates to formulate a strategy. Strategic analysis helps define a strategy that will help stand out from the competitors and to also remain competitive. Another important function of strategic analysis is the prediction of future events and the planning of an alternative approach if the first fail to deliver.
Answer: Direct and indirect statement of cash flows
Explanation: statement of cash flows shows the overall computed inflow and outflow of cash that took place in an organization over a given period of time. It shows how well an organization managed it's cash which is used to settle it's debts and make profit.
The direct method only considers the cash inflow and outflow into account and produces the cash flow from it's operations.
The indirect method considers the net income as the starting point and prepare the inflow and outflow using adjustments.
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
