All categories

3 years ago

Negative performance reviews that lack measurable and realistic goals are most likely to

Business

1 answer:

12345 [234]3 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is demoralize employees.

When a manager is conducting an employee’s negative performance review they need to accompany it with measurable and realistic goals. An employee needs to be given realistic goals to achieve so that they know how they can earn an acceptable review. A negative performance review without measurable and realistic goals will demoralize employees.

You might be interested in

True or False: Capital controls are government-imposed barriers to foreign savers investing in domestic assets or to domestic sa

Archy [21]

Answer:

<h3>hope it helped you sorry if i don't have explanations</h3>

5 0

2 years ago

Is it reasonable to assume that regardless of your relationship with your teammates, or coworkers, you will still show them resp

arsen [322]

Answer:

yes it is

Explanation:

there´s always the premise, that you have to separate your personal of your work life, so is totally reasonable that you have always to show respect to your coworkers because it helps to get better synergies between each other

4 0

3 years ago

Superstition Industries has a $2,000,000 asset investment and is subject to a 30% income tax rate. Cash inflows from the project

nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

12.25%

Explanation:

Calculation to determine what The company's after-tax accounting rate of return on this investment is:

Using this formula

After-tax accounting rate of return =Avarage income/Average investment

Let plug in the formula

After-tax accounting rate of return=($350,000*70%)/$2,000,000

(100%-30%=70%)

After-tax accounting rate of return=$245,000/$2,000,000

After-tax accounting rate of return=0.1225*100

After-tax accounting rate of return=12.25%

Therefore The company's after-tax accounting rate of return on this investment is:12.25%

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose a decrease in consumer confidence has caused aggregate demand to shift from AD to AD1.

Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Based on the shift of aggregate demand from AD to AD1, the aggregate demand would have changed by -$30 Billion.

The expenditures multiplier based on the MPC is 5.

The investment needs to change by $6 billion.

To get to the required investment demand, the Fed needs to change rates from 10% to <u>7%</u> and would need to adjust the money supply by $20 billion increase.

<h3>What is the change in aggregate demand?</h3>

This can be found as:

= ADI - Real GDP at AD

= 90 - 120

= -$30 billion.

<h3>What is the expenditure multiplier?</h3>

This can be found as:

= 1 / ( 1 - MPC)

= 1 / (1 - 0.8)

= 5

<h3 /><h3>What should the investment change by?</h3>

Investment demand should change by:

= Shortfall in GDP / Multiplier

= 30 / 5

= $6 billion

<h3>What interest rate should the Fed implement to the investment level required?</h3>

Investment amount required:

= Current investment + Required investment

= 10 + 6

= $16 billion

Rate needs to become 7% according to graph.

<h3>How much should money supply be adjusted?</h3>

In order to get to the desired 7%, the money supply needs to increase to $50 billion. The adjustment is:

= New level - Current level

= 50 - 30

= $20 billion

Find out more on Money supply at brainly.com/question/3625390.

4 0

2 years ago

From the buyer's perspective, two key issues determine pricing strategy for most firms: perceived value and:

anzhelika [568]

The answer is price sensitivity

I hope that helped

4 0

3 years ago