Answer: Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
An event planner or meeting planner is an individual who is responsible for bringing together every individual implicated in producing a get-together, incentive, special event. This individual understands the intent of the task, or organization's rationale. This requires working with a diverse range of people within the organization, also resources that are considered as external.
Economic cartoons is your answer
Answer and Explanation:
a. The estimation of the contribution margin for each segment is shown below:
(in millions)
<u>Particulars Investor Advisor Services Services </u>
Income from
operations $1,681 $1,660
Add:
Depreciation $171 $154
Contribution
Margin $1,852 $1,814
2. Now the estimation of decline in operating income is
(in millions)
<u>Particulars Combined services Institutional Services </u>
Revenues $9,368 $4,771
Less:
Variable cost $5,702 $2,919
($2,919 + $2,783)
Contribution
margin $3,666 $1,852
Less:
Fixed cost -$325 -$171
Net income $3,341 $1,681
So according to the above calculations, the net operating income is declined by
= $3,341 - $1,681
= $1,660 million
The variable cost is come from
= Service revenues - income from operations - depreciation expense
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Context
Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.
In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.
1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.
Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.
Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.
Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.
Answer:
Underemployed.
Explanation:
This is basically explained as not having enough payed job or working part time; it is also explained to not be usually able to maximize your skills or bring the best in you in the nearest future. In some cases it is a situation of insufficient employment pattern towards a skilled man or a worker in any field that is been presented as the case may be.
This can be seen in a part-time job despite having a burning passion for full time work, and also over-qualification.
