Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
Answer:
start at the top of the command structure
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the best solution to this would most likely be to start at the top of the command structure. This would allow you to go down the chain of command in order to find and stop the communication problem at the source. Which in doing so you will fix the problem completely, since the rest of the employees will begin to receive the correct information regarding the products.
Answer:
In general, the <u>higher</u> the risk of a firm as perceived by its existing and potential investors, the greater is the firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC).
- If a firm is considered to be risky, they will get debt at a high rate to compensate for the risk making WACC greater.
The calculation of a firm’s weighted average cost of capital should be based on the <u>after-tax</u> cost of the dollar of financial capital raised.
- Interest is tax deductible so WACC is calculated net of taxes to cater for this.
It is generally believed that the proportions, or weights, used in the calculation of a firm’s weighted average cost of capital should be based on the market values of the firm’s capital sources. This is because the market value weighting system is more consistent with maximizing the value of the firm’s <u>Shareholder wealth.</u>
- Market Values are the true reflection of shareholder wealth and this is what the company should aim to maximise.
Although the use of market value weights is theoretically superior to the use of book value weights in the calculation of a firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC), firms often use book value weights due to their relative stability compared to the daily changes in market values. <u>True</u>
- Market values tend to fluctuate quite often so it is easier for companies to use book value amounts.
A firm’s new investments, existing assets, and capital structure affect its overall degree of risk and, in turn, its weighted average cost of capital. <u>True</u>
- The assets and potential assets that a company has as well as how it funded those assets determine just how risky the company is and as earlier mentioned, the riskier the firm, the higher the WACC so risk does have an effect on WACC.
Answer:
A. The money multiplier is the amount of money supply with each dollar increase in reserves. so, it is correct.
b.- Since there is an inverse relationship between the reserve ratio and the money multiplier, a higher reserve ratio leads to a lower money multiplier. So increase the ratio and lower the money.
