A writer should hyphenate a compound modifier that comes before the noun it modifies.
Take a look at this example:
No one likes a <em>two-faced </em>person.
As you can see, the modifier <em>two-faced </em>is hyphenated, first of all because it is compound (meaning that it has more than one word), and second of all because it comes before the noun <em>person </em>which it modifies.
<span>"The fact had all gone abroad..." is rags to riches.
The quote describes how the eating house went from "being a poor, struggling...enterprise" to being "celebrated, overcrowded with customers.
"Why, it isn't six months..." is also rags to riches.
He is described at first as sitting up nights on extra allowance to being a millionaire.
"When the crash should come..." is impending doom.
The very beginning indicates that something bad (the crash) is coming. This quote also mentions total destruction.
"Please get those things off..." is rags to riches.
He literally changes his clothes from something ordinary to clothes that were made to order for a prince.
"Deep in debt, not a cent" is wealth worship.
In this quote, he is wishing for a salary that may never materialize.</span>
The flair toothpaste uses the images of a neat dentist that recommends the toothpaste, and also uses the images of nice white people with incredible white teeth. That is the way they use to persuade readers and to create meaning. Other adds as the car ones present a clean and fast road with a family inside the car, enjoying a very nice holidays. So the way to persuade are kind of the same: show happy people with the product that they want to sell
Answer:
your answer: effect, affected
