Answer:
the inventory be reported at on the December 31 balance sheet is $828,000
Explanation:
Here the inventory should be recorded at lower of cost or net realizable value
Since the cost per unit is $46
And, the net realizable value is $48
So, the lowest cost per unit is $46
Now the ending inventory reported is
= 18,000 units × $46 per unit
= $828,000
hence, the inventory be reported at on the December 31 balance sheet is $828,000
Answer and Explanation:
amount borrowed = $10,000
interest rate =12%
interest accrued = $10,000*12%*1/12
= $100
date general journal debit credit
jan 31 interest expense 100
interest payable 100
Answer:
C. What you earn on this security would not change as a result of the change in interest rates.
Explanation:
The increase in the interest rate will decrease the price of the T-Bill if you want to sell it to another investor, but what you will earn with the security will not change at all. Your earnings in dollars = interest rate paid by the T-Bill or any other type of bond.
If you buy and sell securities for a living, then a change in the interest rates can make you win or lose money, since the price of the securities will increase or decrease. If interest rates increase, the price decreases. But if you invest on a security to earn the coupon or interest rate that it pays, a change in the price will not affect you because you already own it. The opportunity cost of holding the security might change, but the accounting revenues will not.
Answer:
No option is correct, since you will have 200 shares and each share should be worth around $60.
Explanation:
If the 2-for-1 stock split takes place then you will have 200 shares instead of 100. For every 1 share that you currently own, the corporation will issue another share.
Since the price of the shares was $120 before the stock split, after the stock split the price will be divided by two (the same proportion). So each new share will cost approximately $60.
In order for option 2 to be correct, the stock spit should have been 3-for-1.
Answer:
The effective rate of protection for the U.S. steel industry is approximately 17.5%
Explanation:
Mathematically, the effective rate of protection is calculated as follows;
e = (n-ab)/(1-a)
where n is the nominal tariff rate on the final product , a is the ratio of the value of the imported input to the value of the finished product and b is the nominal tariff rate on the imported input
Mathematically;
a = value of iron ore/value of steel = 100,00/500,000 = 1/5 = 0.2
From the question, we can see that nominal tariff rate for steel n = 15% = 15/100 = 0.15
The nominal rate for iron ore b = 5% = 5/100 = 0.05
So we substitute all of these into the equation of e above
e = {0.15-0.2(0.05)}/(1-0.2) = (0.15-0.01)/0.8 = 0.14/0.8 = 0.175 which is same as 17.5%