Answer:
The rule of 72 establishes that, to determine the time in which an investment will double its initial capital through the generation of compound interest, 72 must be divided by the interest rate number of said financial investment.
In the present question, the interest rate is 7.8%, with which the investment would double in 9.23 years (72 / 7.8 = 9.23).
Now, at the same time there will be an annual inflation of 4.9%, that is, an accumulated inflation of 45.22% (4.9 x 9.23 = 45.22). In other words, the real growth of investment will not be 100%, but the accumulated inflation will have to be discounted from said number, with which the real growth of investment will be 54.88% over those 9.23 years.
Answer:
The correct option is B,zero monetary cost but a $1,000 per month opportunity cost
Explanation:
Monetary cost also known as explicit cost is the actual costs incurred in running a business.But the business in this case is renting of the property,frankly speaking, Jeane has not incurred any cost in her property business,hence monetary cost is zero.
Opportunity is the cost or benefits from alternative course of action. Jeane not renting out the property on commercial basis is the alternative course of action in this case.Since the commercial letting gives $1500 and the letting to her brother gives $500, the difference between the two rents is $1000 which is benefits forgone from letting the house to her brother,that is the opportunity cost.
Answer:
Option C Incorrect; adjusting for price changes, his salary is less than his dad's salary
Explanation:
Adjustment to price changes = (Amount received n years ago divided by Price Index n years ago) * Price Index today
Adjustment To price changes = ($28,000 / 110.8) * 180.5 = $45613.7
The amount $28,000 is worth $45,613.7 in todays value which means that if we adjust for price changes, Dave is incorrect because his salary is worth less by an amount $613.7 from his father's salary.
Answer:
because you spend 1k or more
