1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
forsale [732]
3 years ago
9

Do arresting officers ever obtain incriminating statements from suspects ?

Law
1 answer:
grin007 [14]3 years ago
3 0

yes i believe so

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Do you agree that the states should have to provide a lawyer to someone accused of committing a serious crime?
spayn [35]

Answer:

Yes I agree that a lawyer should be provide for someone accused of committing a serious crime. I agree because they are being ACCUSED it doesn't mean that they have committed that crime that is why they need someone to fight for them.

Explanation:

sorry if i am wrong

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does our system ensure that the 3 branches must compromise with one another?
den301095 [7]

Answer:

The system of checks and balances is an important part of the Constitution. With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. This way, no one branch becomes too powerful

Explanation:

Hope it helps

4 0
3 years ago
Motorcyclists must make a bigger adjustment in speed than other drivers when __________. A. Driving on a rain-slick road or thro
Mumz [18]

Answer:

D. All of the above

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What are the five missions of the U .N security council
frozen [14]

Answer:

1. Investigating any situation threatening international peace;

2. Recommending procedures for peaceful resolution of a dispute;

3. Calling upon other member nations to completely or partially interrupt economic relations as well as sea, air, postal, and radio communications, or to sever diplomatic relations; and

4. Enforcing its decisions militarily, if necessary.

Explanation:

Sorry, I only know 4 of them

4 0
3 years ago
A jury apportioning damages consistent with the percentage of fault is:
andrezito [222]

Answer:

Comparative negligence is a principle of tort law that applies to casualty insurance in certain states. Comparative negligence states that when an accident occurs, the fault and/or negligence of each party involved is based upon their respective contributions to the accident.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Besides the magistrate court, which other trial court does not have jury trials? Why do you think this court doesn't have jury t
    9·1 answer
  • Asking questions, recognizing deception, recognizing verbal signals and nonverbal signals,
    10·1 answer
  • A loophole that many green-collar criminals have found with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 is that it only protects the anim
    14·1 answer
  • Quá độ lên chủ nghĩa xã hội bỏ qua tư bản chủ nghĩa.
    10·1 answer
  • If you are deaf and communicate with sign language:
    6·1 answer
  • Is our CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM is fair? why or why not​
    9·1 answer
  • In the process of
    8·1 answer
  • Neal, a twelve-year-old, buys a pair of skis from Outdoor Outfitters (OO), telling the salesperson that he has never been skiing
    10·1 answer
  • Idioms and their meanings
    8·1 answer
  • What supreme court decision in effect meant that the constitution protected slavery?.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!