The best is to ask Julia to sit down and discuss with her the issue by asking her to support her ideas (first option).
<h3>What is this conflict about?</h3>
In this situation, you are having an argument with an employee or colleague and this argumentseems to have got out of control.
<h3>What should you do?</h3>
Instead of continuing arguing, calm down and ask Julia to do the same. Then sit down with Julia, acknowledge her contribution to the company but ask her to better support her ideas.
Learn more about conflicts in brainly.com/question/12832202
#SPJ1
Answer:
The quality of social service delivery in South Africa is very poor.
Explanation:
The quality of service may be poor due to several factors such as the manipulation of politicians, no accountability of work done, not enough workforce employed to do the necessary job, unprepared in terms of planning, failure to cope up with change in the dynamic environment etc.
The social service delivery can be improved by understanding the needs of the market, handling the information better, hiring better and qualified workforce, updating and implementing policies to cope up with change and provide time in planning the service delivery.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The Short run supply curve: In a perfectly competitive market, the supply curve is apportion of its rising part of the marginal cost curve. It lies above the minimum of the avergae varibale cost curve. Here, the average variable cost is $14. So, in this case, the short run supply curve would be the portion of the marginal cost curve lies above $14. thus, it should lie above $14.
Thus, the correct option from the given options is A.
Answer:
C) Yes, because the direct rates differ in all markets
Explanation:
₤1 buys €1.50 in NY, Tokyo, and London -> ₤1 = €1.50
₤1 buys ¥150 in NY, Tokyo, and London -> ₤1 = ¥150
⇔ €1.50 = ¥150
⇔ ¥100 = €1.50/1,5 = €1
$1 buys ¥100 in NY, Tokyo, and London - > $1 = ¥100
Tt clearly that €1 is different with $1.0 (as Reuter quoted today, $1.00 = €0.9030), so there’re opportunity for two-point arbitrage
.
