it would have to be D.Zapata because Emiliano Zapata (1879-1919) was just the leader of southern peasants during the Mexican Revolution
Estereótipos construídos ao longo de 517 anos que massacram e invisibilizam os povos indígenas. A última mesa da Festa Literária Internacional de Cachoeira (Flica), neste domingo (8), propôs a reflexão a respeito dos equívocos históricos e culturais perpetuados dentro das escolas, rodas de conversas e todas as esferas políticas e sociais quando o assunto e o povo indígena.
Com os escritores Daniel Munduruku e Eliane Potiguara, o público foi convidado a se livrar de amarras do preconceito enraizado e que destrói milhares de culturas indígenas que resistem no Brasil: uma proposta de descolonização do pensamento.
"Meu avô costumava dizer o tempo que nós vivemos é o melhor tempo. Não é tempo atual não fosse bom, não se chamaria presente. Nós não somos nem o passado e muito menos do futuro, somos sempre apresentados ", disse o escritor Daniel Munduruku. Para ele, há 517 anos de idade, um desencontro entre pessoas, quando a cultura europeia tentou suprimir a cultura indígena e provocou uma cisão.
Answer:
Ferdinand Magellan
Explanation:
He was the first European recorded to have landed in the Philippines. He arrived in March 1521
Answer:
I would say B
Explanation:
are really big into mythology and a lot of the stories that they used to tell still exist today . I'm really sorry if it's wrong :\
hope this helps :]
Answer:
Explanation:
Throughout American history, the differences between the northern and southern states have often been the cause of divisions between the two. The American Civil War was the climax of an escalating feud between the north-based Union and the south-based Confederacy, a feud that had a significant basis in the different attitudes and lifestyles of each side`s respective citizens. Although the Civil War was based on more than one issue, slavery became a considerably important topic as the War went on. After numerous disputes about state and federal rights, and the election of Abraham Lincoln on an anti-slavery platform, several “cotton states” seceded from the United States, sparking what would become the Civil War. While it is certainly true that a significant portion of the North’s anti-slavery conviction was based on moral principles, to argue that morality was the sole factor in the Union’s abolitionist ideals would be a false generalization. In fact, many of the North’s anti-slavery ideals were not based on morality, but rather political, economical, and even racist factors. The anti-slavery ideology of many northerners extended far past mere moral rationale and into reasons of self-gain. Unfortunately, this area of history has often been modified to place the North (whose ideals formed the foundation of modern America) in a better light.
