1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sophie [7]
3 years ago
9

Help ASAP please! Thanks in advance.

Mathematics
1 answer:
ASHA 777 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Step-by-step explanation:

The second one, of course. Because the inequality means that x must be smaller than -3. So in negative numbers, numbers are getting smaller when they go far from 0. So -8\frac{2}{3},-6,-4, -3,5 are smaller than -3 because the distance between 0 and these numbers are more than he distance between zero and -3. Good luck :)

You might be interested in
Pls answer ASAP I will give brainliest answer.
quester [9]
The answer would be 9.45
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Martha wrote an example of a quadratic function for a homework assignment. The function she wrote is shown. f(x) = 5x3 + 2x2 + 7
larisa86 [58]

<u><em>Answer:</em></u>

<u>The two correct options are:</u>

The first term, 5x³, can be eliminated

The exponent on the first term, 5x³, can be changed to 2 and then combined with the second term, 2x²

<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>

The degree of an expression is given based on the highest power in the expression

<u>The given expression is:</u>

5x³ + 2x² + 7x - 3

We can note that the highest power in the given expression is 3 which means that <u>the degree of the expression is 3</u>

<u>A quadratic function</u> is a function of <u>degree 2</u>. This means that the highest degree in the expression (function) must be 2

Accordingly, Martha should get rid of the term with power 3 (5x³) in her equation

<u>This can be done by 2 methods:</u>

1- She simply eliminates the term with the third degree

2- She changes the degree of the term with degree 3 to a lower degree and combines it with any existent like term

<u>Comparing the above with the given options, we can conclude that the two correct options are:</u>

- The first term, 5x³, can be eliminated

- The exponent on the first term, 5x³, can be changed to 2 and then combined with the second term, 2x²

Hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Let ρ = x3 + xe−x for x ∈ (0, 1), compute the center of mass.
hram777 [196]

The center of mass is mathematically given as

\bar{x}=\left(\frac{44 e-100}{25 e-40}\right)\end{aligned}

<h3>What is the center of mass.?</h3>

Determine the center of mass in one dimension:

Represent the masses at the respective distances.

\begin{|c|c|} Masses \ & \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Located at \\\rho=x^{3}+x \cdot e^{-x} & \ \  \ \  x \in(0,1)$ \\\end

We calculate the total mass of the system.

\begin{aligned}m &=\int_{0}^{1} \rho \cdot d x \\& m =\int_{0}^{1}\left(x^{3}+x \cdot e^{-x}\right) \cdot d x \\&m =\left|\frac{x^{4}}{4}-(x+1) e^{-x}\right|_{0}^{1} \\&m =\left(\frac{5}{4}-\frac{2}{e}\right)\end{aligned}

Step 03: Calculate the moment of the system.

\begin{aligned}M &=\int_{0}^{1}(\rho \cdot x) \cdot d x \\& M=\int_{0}^{1}\left(x^{4}+x^{2} \cdot e^{-x}\right) \cdot d x \\&M =\left|\frac{x^{5}}{5}-\left(x^{2}-2 x+2\right) \cdot e^{-x}\right|_{0}^{1} \\&M=\left(\frac{11}{5}-\frac{5}{e}\right)\end{aligned}

we calculate the center of mass.

\begin{aligned}\bar{x} &=\left(\frac{M}{m}\right) \\& \bar{x}=\left\{\left(\frac{\left.11-\frac{5}{5}\right)}{\left(\frac{5}{4}-\frac{2}{e}\right)}\right\}\right.\\& \bar{x}=\left(\frac{11 e-25}{5 e}\right) \cdot\left(\frac{4 e}{5 e-8}\right) \\&\bar{x}=\left(\frac{44 e-100}{25 e-40}\right)\end{aligned}

Read more about the center of mass.

brainly.com/question/27549055

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Y = f(x) + 3<br> describe the functions that take place
hram777 [196]

Answer:

A function can be reflected about an axis by multiplying by negative one. To reflect about the y-axis, multiply every x by -1 to get -x. To reflect about the x-axis, multiply f(x) by -1 to get -f(x).

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Solve sec2theta + tantheta - 3 =0 for 0
Serhud [2]

Answer:

Ф = \frac{\pi }{4} ,\frac{5\pi}{4}

Step-by-step explanation:

It is a bit difficult to input the work here, so I uploaded an image

  • First we can use the trig identities to change sec²(Ф) to tan²(Ф) + 1
  • Then we can combine like terms
  • Then we can factor this as a polynomial function
  • Then we can set each term equal to zero and solve for Ф
  • The first term tan(Ф) - 2 = 0 has no solution because tan(Ф) ≠ -2 anywhere
  • The second term tan(Ф) - 1 = 0 has two solutions of \frac{\pi}{4} and \frac{5\pi}{4} so these are the solutions to the problem

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 13 + 2v - 8 + 6 &gt; -7 - v please simplify and explain in number form!
    15·1 answer
  • Hello, My Cousin Needs Help (She Said Do The Even Numbers) PLEASE
    5·1 answer
  • In one day, Joe consumes 530 calories by drinking 1 serving of juice, 2 s
    9·1 answer
  • Which item has a unit rate of $6.50?
    9·2 answers
  • Can someone please answer. There is one question. There's a picture thank you!
    9·1 answer
  • Which expression completes the table?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the area of this triangle? (Image Attached)
    5·2 answers
  • Evaluate 13-0.75w+8x when w=12 and x=1/2
    12·1 answer
  • What is 13 to the second power
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!! I'LL GIVE BRAINLEST!!
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!