Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's <em>at least one</em> element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:
<em>Not all owls can fly.</em>
Answer:
1. 5 + y = 7
⇒ y = 7 - 5
⇒<u>y = 5</u>
2. 3.8 = a + 2.5
⇒ a = 2.5 - 3.8
⇒ <u>a = -1.3</u>
3. 5 + p = 9 1/3
⇒ p = 9 1/3 - 5
⇒ p = 28/3 - 5
⇒ p = 28/3 - 15/3
⇒ p = 13/3
⇒<u> </u><u>p = 4 1/3</u>
∠СXA = ∠BXA + ∠СXB = 30°20' + 40°35' = 70°55'
-8.1
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Times </em><em>all </em><em>by </em><em>9</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>get </em><em>rid </em><em>of </em><em>fraction</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Take </em><em>2</em><em>1</em><em>.</em><em>6</em><em> </em><em>away</em><em> </em><em>from</em><em> </em><em>both</em><em> </em><em>sides</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Divide</em><em> </em><em>by </em><em>-</em><em>4</em>
<em>
</em>
