Answer:
0.4766
Explanation:
Given:
WACC = 9.7%
Company’s cost of equity = 12%
Pretax cost of debt = 7.5%
Tax rate = 35%
Now,
WACC
= Weight × Cost of equity + (1 - weight) × Pretax cost of debt × (1-tax rate)
or
0.097 = weight × 0.12 + ( 1 - weight ) × 0.075 × (1 - 0.35)
or
0.097 = 0.12 × weight + 0.04875 - 0.04875 × weight
or
0.04825 = 0.07125 × weight
or
weight = 0.6772
also,
weight = 
or
= 
or
= 
+ 1
or
1.4766 = + 1
or
= 0.4766
Answer:
<u>expansionary; will be equal to</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember</em>, monetary policies are basically divided into:
- expansionary monetary policy, and
- contractionary monetary policy.
Indeed, as the name implies, the expansionary monetary policy is meant to in a sense boost up economic growth in terms of reducing interest rates thereby theoretically increasing spending and also leading to an increase in the money supply. When there is an increase in the money supply, this thus leads to an increased inflation rate, which would be expected if workers and firms have rational expectations.
The correct answer is C. Money is safer in the bank.
Explanation:
The main point or position of Jonas is that savings should be kept in an account due to the costs associated with this. In this context, the only argument that refutes Jonas' position and it is directly related to the main point of Jonas is "Money is safer in the bank" because even if keeping savings in a bank requires to pay fees this guarantees the money will be safe, which does not occur if Jonas keeps his savings at home. Moreover, the safety factor makes the option of the bank better, which refutes Jonas position.
Answer:
-3 million dollars
Explanation:
we have EVA = economic value added
to ge the EVA, we use this formula :
(operating return on the assets - cost of the total capital) multiplied by the total assets
total assets = 100 million
operating return = 12 percent
cost of capital = 15 percent
the EVA = 12% - 15% * 100000000
= -0.03 * 100000000
= -3,000,000 dollars
b. The loss of the value of the shareholder is happening even though the firm is earning ROI that is more than the average firm in the industry.
When using horizontal differentiation, a firm divides itself into sub units based on function, type of business, or Geographic area
Horizontal differentiation
Is basically concerned with how the firm decides to divide itself into sub units. The decision is typically made on the basis of function, type of business, or geographical area. In many firms, just one of these criteria predominates, but more complex solutions are adopted in others. This is particularly likely in the case of international firms, where the conflicting demands to organize the company around different products (to realize location and experience curve economies) and different national markets (to remain locally responsive) must be reconciled. One solution to this dilemma is to adopt a matrix structure that divides the organization on the basis of both products and national markets.
Functional structure :
A functional structure can work well for a firm that is active in a single line of business and focuses on a single geographic area. But problems can develop once the firm expands into different businesses or geographies.
Learn more about Horizontal differentiation :
brainly.com/question/17203768
#SPJ4
