Answer:
The president can quickly direct the agencies of the exclusive branch to respond to economic, social, or political needs by signing executive orders.
Explanation:
Executive orders are decrees signed by the President of the United States, which serve to immediately legislate issues that have been granted to the presidential powers set forth in Article II of the United States Constitution. Even the President can issue executive orders on issues not authorized by the Constitution, in which case they must be approved by Congress. In all cases and like federal laws, its content can be reviewed by the Supreme Court.
Their usefulness is explained by the immediacy with which said executive orders come into force, since they do not need prior congressional debate. Therefore, many times, for reasons of necessity and practicality, presidents dictate this type of legislation.
Every line of my serious writing since 1936 has been, in some way, a direct or indirect argument against tyranny and in favor of democratic socialism, as I understand it, according to George Orwell.
Eric Arthur Blair, better known by his pen name George Orwell, is an English novelist, essayist, and critic best known for his books Animal Farm (1945) and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), the latter of which is a profound anti-utopian work that explores the perils of totalitarian control.
However, his debut book, Down and Out in Paris and London, was published in 1933 under the name George Orwell despite the fact that he was born Eric Arthur Blair (the surname he derived from the beautiful River Orwell in East Anglia). After a while, only close family members were aware of his real identity, Blair, because his nom de plume had grown so strongly associated with him. As Orwell transitioned from being a stalwart of the British imperial elite to a literary and political rebel, his name change reflected a significant change in his lifestyle.
Learn more about George Orwell here
brainly.com/question/11881723
#SPJ4
Hey there! I'm happy to help!
Let's look at our answer options real quick about how it was possible for the French and Indian War to lead to the Revolutionary War.
1. The British made the Americans fight all by themselves.
2. It made the Indians fight against the colonists.
3. The French and Indian War was lost so they had to fight all over again.
4. The French and Indian War left many unresolved issues.
Answer #1 is wrong because the British and the Americans fought together in the French and Indian War.
Answer #2 is incorrect because the Indians fighting against the colonists in the French and Indian war has nothing to do with the Revolutionary War.
Answer #3 is incorrect because the British defeated the French, not the other way around.
Answer #4 is the only answer left and it makes sense. War is very expensive and the British were in a lot of debt because of it, and this led them to start taxing the Americans which triggered them and started the Revolutionary War.
Therefore, the answer is The French and Indian War left many unresolved issues.
Have a wonderful day! :D
<span>Legislative can rule a law passed by Congress as unconstitutional</span>
