1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataly [62]
3 years ago
15

In a plane, line b is parallel to line f, line f Is parallel to line g, and line h is perpendicular to line b. Which of the foll

owing cannot be true?
hif
bih
bllg
GIlh
Mathematics
1 answer:
Aleonysh [2.5K]3 years ago
4 0
Hif, i doesn’t exist in the problem
You might be interested in
Can someone help me I'm so confused
nikklg [1K]
A is the correct answer. A coefficient is just a number that appears in front of a variable. Please note that a number that doesn't have a variable behind it is still a coefficient since there is technically a variable behind it with a power of 0. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A line passes through the points (2,-2) and (-6,2). The point (a.-4) is also on the line. What is the value of a?
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

<u><em>6</em></u>

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there) The formula of your line is:

-2=2k+b\\2=-6k+b\\=>4=-8k\\k=-0.5\\=> b=-2+1=-1\\=>y=-\dfrac{1}{2}x-1\\

If point has y=-4, then:

-4=-\dfrac{1}{2}a-1\\4=\dfrac{1}{2}a+1\\a=6

Hope this helps) Have a nice day/night :)

8 0
3 years ago
7] A recent poll discovered that only 24.5% of Americans are getting the recommended amount of exercise per week. Briscoe Middle
Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer:

your TRASH NOOB LOSER

Step-by-step explanation:

so todya eat hesde

In a handful of other worlds”particularly conservative Catholic ones”the essay did quite well. But those were the worlds that hardly needed it. For people of that persuasion, the omnipresent assault on Pius XII drives them toward the worst possibilities for their communities: a dread that rampant anti-Catholicism is shortly to unleash itself upon themhunger to flee to small fellowships of the saved and away from the corruption of the public square, an embracing of a self-image as victims, and a belief that a dark cloud rests over the sum of modern times. “Even a Jewish writer”and a rabbi, too”sees the slander for what it is,” they say. And thereby they confirm, for those whom the essay only angered, that David Dalin let himself be used as a Jew to advance a sectarian Catholic agenda (mine, presumably, although my friends have had the courtesy not to say that to my face). And so the whole coil curls up around itself once more, and we get no forwarder. Perhaps a book that collected the best reviews would help. However large it personally looms, the part played by David and me was small. The attempt to sift through the endless stream of books about Pius XII in recent years was actually carried out by indefatigable reviewers in dozens of magazines and journals, responding to the texts one by one.The controversy also motivated additional research, and new material now seems to arrive every week. As far as I can tell, all this recent information tells in favor of Pius XII. A recently discovered 1923 letter to the Vatican from Eugenio Pacelli, then nuncio to Germany, for instance, denounces Hitler’s putsch and warns against his anti-Semitism and anti-Catholicism. A document from April 1933, just months after Hitler obtained power, reveals how Pacelli (then secretary of state) ordered the new German nuncio, Cesare Orsenigo, to protest Nazi actions. Meanwhile, newly examined diplomatic documents show that in 1937 Cardinal Pacelli warned A. W. Klieforth, the American consul to Berlin, that Hitler was “an untrustworthy scoundrel and fundamentally wicked person,” to quote Klieforth, who also wrote that Pacelli “did not believe Hitler capable of moderation, and . . . fully supported the German bishops in their anti-Nazi stand.” This was matched with the discovery of Pacelli’s anti-Nazi report, written the following year for President Roosevelt and filed with Ambassador Joseph Kennedy, which declared that the Church regarded compromise with the Third Reich as “out of the question.”Archives from American espionage agencies have recently confirmed Pius XII’s active involvement in plots to overthrow Hitler. A pair of newly found letters, written in 1940 on the letterhead of the Vatican’s Secretariat of State, give Pius XII’s orders that financial assistance be sent to Campagna for the explicit purpose of assisting interned Jews suffering from Mussolini’s racial policies. And the Israeli government has finally released Adolf Eichmann’s diaries, portions of which confirm the Vatican’s obstruction of the Nazis’ roundup of Rome’s Jews. There’s more, a regular flow of new material. Intercepts of Nazi communications released from the United States’ National Archives include such passages as “Vatican has apparently for a long time been assisting many Jews to escape,” in a Nazi dispatch from Rome to Berlin on October 26, 1943, ten days after the Germany’s Roman roundup. New oral testimony from such Catholic rescuers as Monsignor John Patrick Carroll-Abbing, Sister Mathilda Spielmann, Father Giacomo Martegani, and Don Aldo Brunacci insists that Pius XII gave them explicit orders and direct assistance to help persecuted Jews in Italy. The posthumous publication this year of Harold Tittmann’s memoir, Inside the Vatican of Pius XII , is particularly interesting, for in it the American diplomat reveals, for the first time, that Pius XII’s wartime conduct drew upon advice from the German resistance.

7 0
3 years ago
(Help needed ASAP I’m confused ) Solve the equation by using the distributive property first
Misha Larkins [42]
I got the answer. Use Brainly
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One angle of an isosceles triangle measures 26°. Which other angles could be in that isosceles triangle?
Julli [10]

Answer:

There are two answers, either of which would work

  • 26°, 26° and 128°
  • 26°, 77° and 77°

Method:

An isosceles triangle has 2 of the same sides so there are two possible answers:

1) 26° is one of the angles which is the same as another. 26° × 2 = 52° and since there are 180° in a triangle the other angle is 180° - 52° which is 128°. This would make the angles 26°, 26° and 128°

2) 26° is not one of the angles which is the same as another. Since there are 180° in a triangle, the other angles would both be 2 ÷ (180° - 26°) which is 77°. This would make the angless 26°, 77° and 77°

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Help meeeeeee plesssss
    5·2 answers
  • A rectangle is drawn on a coordinate plane. Three vertices of the rectangle are points A(−7,2) , B(3,2) , and D(−7,−2) . Point C
    12·1 answer
  • You want to build a fence around a square garden that covers 506.25 ft^2. How many feet of fence will you need to complete the j
    15·1 answer
  • Factor Completely : 3x^3 -12x
    9·1 answer
  • Anna wants to buy a car in two years and wants to have $10,000 for the purchase. How much will Anna need to deposit today in an
    7·1 answer
  • Someone help me with this ASAP
    13·2 answers
  • A survey of 350 people found 150 like birds. 170 like squirrels and 30 like both animals. How many like neither?
    10·1 answer
  • Arithmetic Geometric or Neither...
    10·1 answer
  • What is the slope of the line that contains the points -4,2 and 6,3
    13·1 answer
  • 50 p o i n t s H U R R Y
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!